Unless there is a specific legal requirement, it is not compulsory
for a foreigner to conduct business through a Thai private limited company or other
entity. The foreigner may engage in business, pursuant to an agreement with a Thai
party. For example, it is permissible for a foreign company to enter into an agency
or franchising or licensing or distribution agreement with a Thai company. In
addition, a foreign company may simply sell its products to a Thai purchaser under
a sale and purchase or import/export agreement.
The Foreign Business Act 1999 ("FBA") is currently the principal
Act that deals with the rights of foreigners to own or operate businesses in
Thailand. The FBA places restrictions on foreign ownership or participation in
43 specified business activities divided into three Schedules. In general, if
there are no restrictions on foreign ownership of a particular business activity
under the FBA or under any other law, then majority foreign ownership of such a
business is permissible.
The FBA defines a company as foreign if 50% or more of its shares
are held by foreigners.
The FBA contains provisions prohibiting the use of nominees to
circumvent the foreign business restrictions under the FBA. It is common knowledge
that the said provisions are not actively / strictly enforced by the authorities.
So a majority Thai owned company (where the Thai shareholders are
not adjudged nominees) is considered Thai and not a foreigner, and therefore it
is not subject to the foreign business restrictions under the FBA. As such
foreigners may participate up to 49% in a Thai company engaged in a business
otherwise restricted by the FBA.
The FBA does not prohibit foreign control of a Thai majority owned
company so foreign minority shareholders may protect their interests through the
issuance and holding of shares with weighted voting rights giving them majority
voting rights thereby enabling them to control shareholders' meetings. There are
no general requirements regarding nationality of directors.
In 2007, in what many believe to be an ill-conceived reaction to
Kularb Kaew being used as the holding company in the takeover of telecom giant
Shin Corp., there were attempts to get a draft bill(s) passed to amend the FBA
to significantly expand the definition of foreign companies. Towards the end of
2007, it was reported that it was unlikely that the proposed changes to the FBA
would be approved / moved forward.
Thailand's Asian competitors are lowering barriers to foreign
investment and thus attracting greater interest from potential investors. In
March 2009, the Thai government announced that it will review and consider
liberalizing the foreign ownership rules for certain businesses that are currently
regulated under the FBA.
Schedule 1 businesses: there are 9 businesses listed
under Schedule 1 including agriculture, the media and trading in land. Schedule
1 businesses are prohibited to foreigners, except on a minority basis. There is
no mechanism to apply for majority foreign ownership.
Schedule 2 businesses: there are 13 businesses listed under
Schedule 2 including domestic transport, mining, and certain other primary
activities. Minority foreign ownership of a Schedule 2 business is possible without
permission. Majority foreign ownership is permissible with the permission of the
Minister of Commerce with the approval of the Cabinet. At least 40% of the directors
must be Thai nationals and other conditions can also be imposed in the event that
a permit is granted.
Schedule 3 businesses: there are 21
businesses listed under Schedule 3 including rice farming, fisheries, forestry,
most professions, construction, brokerage, auctioneering, wholesaling, retailing,
advertising, selling food and drink, and all services except those exempted under
regulations. Minority foreign ownership of a Schedule 3 business is permitted
without a license. Majority foreign ownership is permissible with the permission
of the Director-General of the Department of Business Development with the approval
of the Foreign Business Committee (this is the regulatory authority set up under
the FBA). Conditions can be imposed in the event that a permit is granted.
The FBA sets out the criteria for approval of majority foreign
ownership of a Schedule 2 or 3 business and the conditions that can be imposed
in the event that a permit is granted.
The FBA, when compared with the old Alien Business Law of 1972
that it replaced, shows that there are many important manufacturing activities that
are now de-restricted. These include the manufacture of alcoholic and non-alcoholic
beverages, clothing, textiles, footwear, pharmaceuticals, glassware, cement and
stationery.
The FBA has also partially de-restricted certain service businesses
including construction, retailing, wholesaling and trading and distribution. In
some of these cases, certain minimum investment requirements must be observed.
However, most service businesses are still included under Schedule 3 of the FBA,
and therefore it is necessary to apply for permission for majority foreign
ownership of such a business (see above).
Foreign investors should also investigate the possibility of
obtaining majority foreign ownership by forming a company under the provisions
of the US-Thailand Treaty of Amity, or by an application to the Board of Investment
for promotional privileges (see below).
Citizens and corporations of the United States of America havei
preferential rights with regard to the ownership of Thai companies, under this
special treaty signed between Thailand and the USA in 1968. Such rights are on
the basis of reciprocity. Since the USA permits Thais to have majority ownership
of US corporations, Thailand, in general, permits citizens and corporations of
the USA to have majority ownership of a Thai company. There are exceptions to
this general rule. In the areas of communications, transport, fiduciary functions,
banking involving depositary functions, the exploitation of land or natural
resources, domestic trade in indigenous agricultural products and the practice
of a profession, each country may still apply restrictions. The Treaty does not
confer any preferential rights with regard to land ownership. It is to be noted
firstly, that these preferential rights do not apply to the nationals of any
other country. Secondly, the granting of such preferential rights to the citizens
of one country places Thailand in breach of its obligations as a signatory to
the World Trade Agreement. In the long term, it may be that such preferential
rights will have to be extended to the nationals of all other countries, or
abolished.